OBAMA's Frightening words Confirm DIABOLIC NWO saying "It's Done" – Bilderberg Plans World Population Reduction Of 80%
Dear Bilderbirg Group ,You Hide away in the Dark and plot to kill 80 percent of humans The world is awake We Will Defeat You Humanity Will Destroy You ,You Will Stop Your criminal activity's .Canada is awake to your infestation ,you hide away in the dark like evil we will destroy you. The Bilderberg Group even if you do watch it the only way to help is to learn. Bilderberg Will Kill 80% of Humans.
PANDEMIC DISEASE, BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, AND WAR
By Laura K. Donohue
Over the past two decades, concern about the threat posed by biological weapons has grown.
Biowarfare is not new. But prior to the recent trend, the threat largely centered on state use of such weapons. What changed with the end of the Cold War was the growing apprehension that materials and knowledge would proliferate beyond industrialized states’ control, and that “rogue states” or nonstate actors would acquire and use biological weapons.
Accordingly, in 1993 senators Samuel Nunn, Richard Lugar, and Pete Dominici expanded the Cooperative Threat.
Reduction Program to assist the former Soviet republics in securing biological agents and weapons knowledge. The Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction Act gave the Pentagon lead agency responsibility. Senator Lugar explained, “[B]iological weapons, materials, and know-how are now more available to terrorists and rogue nations than at any other time in our
history.”The United States was not equipped to manage the crisis.
The actual acquisition of unconventional weapons by nonstate actors augmented concern.
In 1984, for instance, the Rajneesh cult in Oregon sought to prevent the local community from being able to vote against its land development plans. The group contaminated local salad bars with Salmonella typhimurium, infecting 751 people.
In 1995 Aum Shinrikyo released a sarin nerve gas attack on the Tokyo subway, killing twelve people.
And in 1998 an American citizen, Larry Wayne Harris, obtained plague and anthrax (a vaccine strain) and isolated several other dangerous bacteria.10 His aim was to disseminate biological agents on U.S. soil, using a crop.
Biological Weapons, and War, forthcoming in LAW AND WAR (2014). Duster, to alert the U.S. government to the Iraqi biological weapons threat, and to create a
separate homeland for whites.
These and similar incidents pointed to an alarming trend: from previously a dozen or so investigations per year, in 1997, the FBI opened 74 investigations related to the possible acquisition and use of chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear materials. The following year, it investigated 181 possible incidents.Eighty percent of the cases turned out to be hoaxes,
but a significant number represented unsuccessful attacks.14 By January 31, 1999, Monterey Institute for International Studies had compiled an open-source data base of 415 such incidents— most of which occurred toward the end of the twentieth century—where terrorists had sought to acquire or use weapons of mass destruction.
All of this was before the attacks of September 11, 2001, and al Qaeda’s stated intent to use biological weapons, backed by actual efforts to obtain biological agents.
attacks in autumn 2001 further underscored the threat, killing five people and infecting eighteen others. In 2002 President George W. Bush stated, “The gravest danger to freedom lies at the crossroads of radicalism and technology. When the spread of chemical and biological and nuclear weapons, along with ballistic missile technology—when that occurs, even weak states
and small groups could attain a catastrophic power to strike great nations.” New scholarship began focusing on the threat.19 The consensus was that it was increasingly easier and less expensive to launch a biological attack—using either natural or engineered agents. In order to address the challenge, domestic preparedness needed significantly more attention.
Even as the United States became increasingly concerned about terrorist acquisition or use of biological weapons, scientists and policy-makers began paying more attention to the threat posed by naturally occurring outbreaks of disease. A series of public health incidents catapulted the discussion forward. The first, avian influenza, emerged in Hong Kong in 1997. It infected
eighteen people and killed six more. The disease quickly spread, becoming epizootic and panzootic, having been identified on multiple continents in eagles, tigers, domestic cats, and pigs, as well as aquatic and domesticated birds.
Although it was not initially transferrable between humans, scientists quickly became concerned that the rapid mutations of the disease that occurred in infected animals and humans could quickly create a more virulent strain. Within a decade, the patterns of mortality had changed: whereas in 1997, most deaths occurred among patients older than thirteen years of age, by 2006 the fatality rate for infants and young children had reached 90 percent.
Recollections of the devastation caused by the 1918 Spanish Influenza
heightened fear: also avian in origin, within a year it had become one of the three worst pandemics in history. More than 1 billion worldwide had come down with the flu (half the world’s population), with between 50 and 100 million succumbing.
The disease had killed more than twice the number killed in World War I, with a mortality rate of only 2.5 to 5 percent.
These numbers paled in comparison to the more recent strain of H5N1, where 60 percent of the humans infected with the disease had died. Calls for more stringent quarantine measures emerged.27
A second disease outbreak proved equally disconcerting. In 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), caused by a strain of the same virus underlying the common cold, hit southern China. Within days, it had spread from a hotel in Hong Kong to Hanoi—and as far away as Toronto. Transferred by a small number of “superspreaders,” within months some eight thousand people in twenty-nine countries had contracted it, and nearly eight hundred people had
died. The sudden proliferation of academic and policy-oriented pieces on how to fight emerging diseases followed.
What happens if we lose power indefinitely — foods that require freezing or refrigeration for long term storage are going to go bad. Emergency food storage in advance will be the only way to feed yourself and your family.
EXCLUSIVE: 'Secret plan to inject us ALL with ID chips through vaccination programme'. A "SINISTER plot to secretly inject tiny identity microchips into people while they receive inoculations against diseases will start within weeks", a former politician has extraordinarily claimed.
This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations having heard anything about it. Thus, little information about such invasive mind-control systems is available in professional and academic journals.
The NSA's Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.
Targeting people’s brain functions with electromagnetic fields and beams (from helicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation problem that should be addressed by democratically elected governments. However, there is currently no interest by any national government to seriously address this issue.
The timeline for integrating nano-microchips inside of vaccines is speculative. It could be just a few years, months or perhaps it is here and we already unaware of their integration within pharmaceuticals. Regardless, due to the many military and political advantages, their implementation is inevitable.
However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and pharmaceutical cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations and enact national pandemic preparedness policies which mandate vaccinations.
In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international health regulations that would bind all 194 member countries to pandemic emergency guidelines which could enforce such a mandate. Without these procedures of public health (and propagandized vaccine campaigns) in place, there would be little or no voluntary cooperation from the public to roll up their sleeves and accept the inoculations. Public participation is an essential tool that will soon allow big pharma to inject the most effective surveillence tool ever designed into billions of people.